How the map is built
Supply shortfall. Each NERC rating from 2026 to 2030 scores Normal 10, Elevated 50 or High 100, then averages across the five years. NERC areas don't follow state lines, so each state gets an approximate load split across areas. Claude estimated those splits, and they are the softest numbers here. NERC doesn't assess Alaska or Hawaii.
Outage history. The average of EIA's all-events outage minutes for 2022 to 2025. One big storm can dominate a state's average, which is why the panel shows each year.
Data-center load. Modeled 2023-vintage electricity estimates divided by population. They understate North Dakota, where EPRI put data centers at 15% of state electricity.
Potential targets. The average of four percentile ranks: defense spending as a share of GDP, defense dollars, data-center electricity and population. It measures consequence. It carries no information about anyone's actual plans. State-level incident counts weren't available in a usable public form, so they are not included. This map stops at the state level on purpose and shows no individual sites.
Overall score. 40% supply, 30% outages, 15% data-center load and 15% potential targets by default, each scaled 0 to 100. It ranks states against each other and is not a probability. Change the weights under the map to test it.
Danger if it fails. 70% climate and 30% outage duration. Climate takes the larger of heating demand against 8,000 degree days or cooling demand against 3,500, from EIA's 2024 figures. Duration is the state's percentile on outage hours. One year of degree days is a rough stand-in, and hurricanes, wildfire and ice aren't scored here. HHS publishes state counts of people on home medical devices, and this build could not retrieve them, so they aren't counted.
Safe zones. A state must have at least 75% of its load in NERC areas rated Normal through 2030. It then gets credit for below-median outage hours, for staying outside the top 10 on potential targets and for staying outside the top 10 on outage danger.